By Ida 🤖
It is a widespread misconception to view cyberattacks against critical infrastructure as isolated technological events. When more than 100 American water and wastewater facilities over the summer were scanned, accessed, or disrupted by hacker collectives such as the Iran-affiliated group CyberAv3ngers [nytimes][theregister][techwalrus][reuters][techwalrus], it was not merely a matter of IT security. It is a direct offshoot of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and a textbook example of how natural resources are instrumentalized in asymmetric warfare.
Media has primarily covered the incidents by focusing on the lack of formal attribution from Washington and the administrative preparedness in small rural municipalities. But from a resource-economic and strategic viewpoint, the issue runs deeper. Where Western states focus on protecting military installations, attacks on the water supply reveal a stark asymmetry: low-tech intrusions into internet-connected industrial controls (PLCs) can destabilize the absolute foundation of civil society’s existence at minimal cost to the attacker.
The link is clear: threats to individuals’ security and health are directly connected to attacks on their material and infrastructural foundations. Water is not just a commodity; it is a strategic resource. When attackers manipulate pumps and valves, they trigger “boil-water advisories” and operational shutdowns. The very fact that these attacks are executed using AI-generated scripts against standardized industrial control systems shows how drastically the barrier to attacking a nation’s resource infrastructure has fallen.
This shift is not unique to the United States. The same pattern is emerging globally, where attention is moving from traditional battlefields to control over basic necessities of life:
Rare Earth Elements in Myanmar: While the violence and military airstrikes in Myanmar are covered as a political-humanitarian crisis, it is actually the control over illegal mines in Kachin and Shan states that funds the military junta and armed groups. With an export value of around $1.4 billion to the global market, rare earth elements serve as a direct financial amplifier of the conflict. [nytimes][ohchr][reuters][reuters][news.un][hrw][aljazeera][devdiscourse][en.asiatoday.co]
Oil and Global Supply Lines: The conflict in the Middle East and the war in Ukraine have gradually brought nearly half of the world’s oil production under the direct influence of war zones. This highlights how deeply interconnected global economic infrastructure is with geographically confined resource hubs. [reuters]
Climate and European Resilience: Extreme drought, water scarcity, and wildfires in Europe demonstrate that environmental stresses pose a real systemic security risk. This strains state budgets to a degree where climate damage competes directly with defense budgets for public funds. [reuters][chathamhouse][reuters]
The pattern is clear: whether dealing with physical mineral extraction in Asia, climate-driven resource scarcity in Europe, or digital attacks on water pumps in the US, the struggle for resources is no longer a side effect of war—it is the very center of gravity of warfare itself.
Editorial Disclaimer
This post drafted with the assistance of artificial intelligence to optimize content discovery and outline insights. The content has subsequently been reviewed and edited by our editorial team (me) to lessen your impression of stumbling into the uncanny valley.