Skip to content

ECOWAR

Resource conflict and ecosystem diplomacy in bullet point updates – since 2008

Menu
  • About Ecowar
    • About Benno Hansen
    • Privacy Policy
  • Økofascismens ideologer og aktører
  • The Book
Menu

New evidence UN Secretary General was killed by British mercenaries in 1961

Posted on 21st August 2011 by Benno Hansen

This week new evidence that former UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskjöld was murdered on 18th September 1961 has been covered by The Guardian. The Wikipedia entry about him already lists a number of “conspiracy theories”.

Who was Dag Hammarskjöld?

Swedish diplomat and economist who worked hard to promote peace tending to favor the independence of nations at a time when the world was locked in cold war and colonialism still characterized the business relationships between western corporations and developing nations. He intervened in the Suez crisis in 1957, angering Britain and France, and in the Bizerte crisis in 1961, angering France again. He morally supported newly independent Guinea, this time infuriating France who then whithdrew support for the UN Congo operation and encouraged French mercenaries to join the Congolese rebels fighting UN forces. Dag Hammarskjöld estabished the armed United Nations Emergency Force and generally strengthened the position of the United Nations considerably.

18 September 1961 the Douglas DC-6 transporting him and his delegation to cease-fire negotiations mysteriously crashed near the copper mining city Ndola (which is now in Zambia). The search and rescue mission was delayed. Official inquiries have failed to conclude on the cause of the crash and are inconsistent in certain details. These investigations were partly managed and influenced by the British military who were also there to protect British mining companies.

Dag Hammarskjöld with Trygve Lie
Dag Hammarskjöld (left), with his predecessor Trygve Lie today at UN Headquarters.
13 April 1953.

The conspiracy theories

Why was the rescue mission delayed? Why were local witnesses sent away, not interrogated? Why were the only survivor allowed to die unnecessarily in a poor local hospital? Why were poor reports on the cause of the crash rubber stamped? Didn’t the British troops have conflicts of interest when they arranged the very peace negotiation Dag was to attend even while protecting the mining companies that supported the rebellion?

“… in order to pay a tribute to this great man, now vanished from the scene, and to his colleagues, all of whom have fallen victim to the shameless intrigues of the great financial Powers of the West… the Government has decided to proclaim Tuesday, 19 September 1961, a day of national mourning.”
– Prime Minister of the Republic of the Congo, 1961

“Dag Hammarskjöld was on the point of getting something done when they killed him. Notice that I said, ‘when they killed him’.”
– Harry Truman, 33rd President of the United States (1945–1953)

Letter from Dag Hammarskjold top aides Conor Cruise O’Brien and George Ivan Smith detailing their version of the story; Guardian 1992.

“[I have] documents purporting to be from an institution called the SA Institute of Maritime Research discussing the sabotage of the aircraft in which the UN Secretary-General, Dag Hammarskjold, died on the night of September 17/18, 1961.”
– Archbishop Desmond Tutu, 1998

The new evidence

A metal plate fragment from the DC6, previously unpublished UN telegrams and many interviews with local witnesses have been conducted by Göran Björkdahl and The Guardian the past three years. The telegraphs (cables) reveal anger from the US, British and almost all other major powers on the security council towards the UN military operation in Congo and Dag’s support for decolonization. The witnesses all tell of a small plane opening fire on the larger, crashing plane.

“Hammarskjöld’s DC6 was brought down […] the motive was to maintain the west’s control over Katanga minerals”
– Göran Björkdahl, Swedish aid worker, writing in Guardian

“It’s clear there were a lot of circumstances pointing to possible involvement by western powers. The motive was there – the threat to the west’s interests in Congo’s huge mineral deposits. And this was the time of black African liberation, and you had whites who were desperate to cling on. Dag Hammarskjöld was trying to stick to the UN charter and the rules of international law. I have the impression from his telegrams and his private letters that he was disgusted by the behaviour of the big powers.”
– Göran Björkdahl, Swedish aid worker, speaking to Guardian

Sources (if not as otherwise stated): Guardian / Dag Hammarskjöld unable to overcome Congo’s troubled history, Guardian / Dag Hammarskjöld: evidence suggests UN chief’s plane was shot down, Guardian / ‘I have no doubt Dag Hammarskjöld’s plane was brought down’, UN cable 11 September 1961: UN frustrations with British behaviour spill over, Top secret UN cable 15 September 1961: Hammarskjöld rejects American criticism.


Related

Post navigation

← News from Kenya: food price spike worsen hunger, smartphone sales skyrocket
Risk of riots linked to food prices →

Recent Posts

  • Hvordan Klimaforandringer Øger Risikoen for Konflikter gennem Økonomiske Chok, Landbrugsnedgang, Ressourcekonkurrence og Migration
  • Ukraine og USA indgår milliardaftale om sjældne mineraler
  • Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024
  • Striden over olie-regionen Essequibo blusser op mellem Venezuela og Guyana
  • Honduran journalist investigating deforestation assassinated

Recent Comments

  • Benno Hansen on Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024

Categories

  • Money
  • Monthly News
  • Moves and books
  • Opinion
  • Reports
  • Uncategorised
  • Weekly News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • February 2023
  • July 2022
  • May 2021
  • May 2020
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • November 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
© 2025 ECOWAR | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme