Skip to content

ECOWAR

Resource conflict and ecosystem diplomacy in bullet point updates – since 2008

Menu
  • About Ecowar
    • About Benno Hansen
    • Privacy Policy
  • Økofascismens ideologer og aktører
  • The Book
Menu

What does climate change have to do with conflict?

Posted on 11th November 2010 by Benno Hansen

Rebecca Sargent at a piece of conflict has been reading CLIMATE CHANGE, CONFLICT AND FRAGILITY – Understanding the linkages, shaping effective responses, a report by Dan Smith and Janani Vivekananda of International Alert. (It’s from November 2009 and a copy of it has been waiting on my hard disk for me to read it for quite a while now. But why not check out Rebecca’s take on it right away?)

Part one – Exacerbation of conflict in fragile states during climate change

One needs only see the example of the Haitian earthquake, the current flooding in Pakistan or even the aftermath of hurricane Katrina in the southern US to know that extreme weather can have an effect on peace and security in an area. […] Current international negotiations on reducing global warming and responding to climate change almost entirely ignore the aspect of this heightened risk of conflict. […] Managing water supply is vital. Not only is it necessary for human life, but water shortages also affect agriculture causing increased food insecurity, especially for the poor. […] Water shortages and food insecurity often lead to violent conflict where poverty, weak governance, political marginalization and corruption reign supreme. […] Migration of people increases the likelihood of conflict, as newcomers are seen as an unwanted burden that compound social pressures or even transfer conflict from one location to another. Attempting to block immigration with regulations and physical barriers may exacerbate the conflict risk.

Part two – Policy and adaptation recommendations for reducing conflict risk

Good governance means increased resilience to violent conflict or poverty. […] Many rich countries will be simultaneously shifting to low-carbon economies to meet demands on climate change adaptability. This shift must be peace-friendly and supportive of the adaptive development happening in poorer countries. For example, a switch to bio-fuel in richer countries caused food prices to rise by 30% in 2008, which directly caused violence in over 30 countries.

Rebecca’s final comment isn’t from the report:

If these crises are compounded and not isolated to one location within a nation, or result in large-scale destruction of entire areas, even rich states may be unable to deal with the crises that emerge. The expectations in richer states for action is higher, therefore state failure may be reacted to with all the more intense violence.

“This report explores the complexities of responding to climate change in fragile and conflict affected contexts. It highlights the interaction between the impact of climate change and the social and political realities in which people live and stresses that it is this that will determine their capacity to adapt. To be effective, the goal of policy responses must be to address the political dimension of adapting to climate change, and the underlying causes of vulnerability where the state is unable to carry out its core functions. The report sets out five policy objectives and some key observations on getting the institutional structures right in order to achieve this goal. The reports findings urge policy makers to look beyond technical fixes and to address the interlinked political, social and institutional constraints to effective responses.”
Figure 1, page 10, chapter 2.3 “Climate change in fragile states”.

The report exists in a context of development aid hence to some degree focus on how foreign aid from rich countries should change. From the Conclusion:

It is wrong to imply that henceforth there will be old-style development with adaptation on top. […] it seems likely that much and probably most expenditure on adaptation will simply be indistinguishable from expenditure on development because the activities will be fused.

The over all conclusion is summed up in five bullet points:

  1. Adaptation to climate change needs to be conflict-sensitive.
  2. Peacebuilding needs to be climate-proof.
  3. A low-carbon economy must be supportive of development and peace.
  4. Poor countries’ social capacity to understand and manage climate and conflict risks must be strengthened.
  5. Climate-related migration should be planned for and coped with peacefully.

Related

Post navigation

← The Yes Men adbusts Chevron greenwash
It is that time of the year when… →

Recent Posts

  • Hvordan Klimaforandringer Øger Risikoen for Konflikter gennem Økonomiske Chok, Landbrugsnedgang, Ressourcekonkurrence og Migration
  • Ukraine og USA indgår milliardaftale om sjældne mineraler
  • Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024
  • Striden over olie-regionen Essequibo blusser op mellem Venezuela og Guyana
  • Honduran journalist investigating deforestation assassinated

Recent Comments

  • Benno Hansen on Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024

Categories

  • Money
  • Monthly News
  • Moves and books
  • Opinion
  • Reports
  • Uncategorised
  • Weekly News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • February 2023
  • July 2022
  • May 2021
  • May 2020
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • November 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
© 2025 ECOWAR | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme