Skip to content

ECOWAR

Resource conflict and ecosystem diplomacy in bullet point updates – since 2008

Menu
  • About Ecowar
    • About Benno Hansen
    • Privacy Policy
  • Økofascismens ideologer og aktører
  • The Book
Menu

To the Brits, the Iraq war was about oil

Posted on 21st April 2011 by Benno Hansen

Oil activist Greg Muttitt and The Independent has set the topic since Tuesday’s breaking-yet-hardy-surprising Secret memos expose link between oil firms and invasion of Iraq. Quotes in chronological order:

Pre-war, in private

“Shell and BP could not afford not to have a stake in [Iraq] for the sake of their long-term future… We [are] determined to get a fair slice of the action for UK companies in a post-Saddam Iraq.”
– Then Foreign Office’s Middle East director Edward Chaplin, October 2002

“Baroness Symons agreed that it would be difficult to justify British companies losing out in Iraq in that way if the UK had itself been a conspicuous supporter of the US government throughout the crisis. [Trade Minister Symons agree to] report back to the companies before Christmas [on lobbyist progress in Washington].”
– Minutes of a meeting with BP, Shell and UK government, 31 October 2002

November 2002 the British Foreign Office invited BP to discuss opportunities posed by ‘regime change’:

“Iraq is the big oil prospect. BP are desperate to get in there and anxious that political deals should not deny them the opportunity to compete. The long-term potential is enormous…”
– Foreign Office memorandum, 13 November 2002

Pre-war, in public

“Let me just deal with the oil thing because… the oil conspiracy theory is honestly one of the most absurd when you analyse it. The fact is that, if the oil that Iraq has were our concern, I mean we could probably cut a deal with Saddam tomorrow in relation to the oil. It’s not the oil that is the issue, it is the weapons…”
– Tony Blair, 6 February 2003

“We have no strategic interest in Iraq. If whoever comes to power wants Western involvement post the war, if there is a war, all we have ever said is that it should be on a level playing field. We are certainly not pushing for involvement.”
– BP, 12 March 2003

“It is not in my or BP’s opinion, a war about oil. Iraq is an important producer, but it must decide what to do with its patrimony and oil.”
– Lord Browne, the then-BP chief executive, 12 March 2003

“We have neither sought nor attended meetings with officials in the UK Government on the subject of Iraq. The subject has only come up during conversations during normal meetings we attend from time to time with officials… We have never asked for ‘contracts’.”
– Shell, 12 March 2003


Post-leak

“Before the war, the Government went to great lengths to insist it had no interest in Iraq’s oil. These documents provide the evidence that give the lie to those claims. We see that oil was in fact one of the Government’s most important strategic considerations, and it secretly colluded with oil companies to give them access to that huge prize.”
– Oil activist Greg Muttitt

Greg Muttitt is publishing a book on Iraqi oil business, Fuel on the Fire, and has a Twitter account named after the book.

This story elsewhere: Reuters / UK held talks with oil firms before Iraq invasion -paper, The Sydney Morning Herald / Memos show oil motive in Iraq war and France 24’s YouTube (first 1½ minutes):

Related

Post navigation

← More of the same. And then…
Rape – weapon and cultural disease? →

Recent Posts

  • Hvordan Klimaforandringer Øger Risikoen for Konflikter gennem Økonomiske Chok, Landbrugsnedgang, Ressourcekonkurrence og Migration
  • Ukraine og USA indgår milliardaftale om sjældne mineraler
  • Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024
  • Striden over olie-regionen Essequibo blusser op mellem Venezuela og Guyana
  • Honduran journalist investigating deforestation assassinated

Recent Comments

  • Benno Hansen on Fra Donbas’ mineralrigdom til Europas fiskerikrise – klip fra økokrigen i august 2024

Categories

  • Money
  • Monthly News
  • Moves and books
  • Opinion
  • Reports
  • Uncategorised
  • Weekly News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Archives

  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • February 2023
  • July 2022
  • May 2021
  • May 2020
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • November 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • April 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
© 2025 ECOWAR | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme